Review: Sahib Biwi Aur Gangster

Posted on October 4th, 2011 by Harsh

Sahib Biwi And Gangster from its first look seems to be a medium-budget film that invests and cut costs at various stages of production. With a fairly well-known lead cast with the exception of currently struggling and off-color Randeep Hooda, the film introduces many a fresh faces in the first 10 minutes leading to a confusion of characters and plots. You feel you are in for another directorial misadventure. Well, in a way you are and you are not. You are because the film puzzles at times like whose side is Babloo (Randeep Hooda), the driver of royal Sahib (Jimmy Shergil) is on – Sahib’s or his rival’s. The saving grace, as you move on, is convincing acting of Jimmy Shergill. He settles easily into the character and has the swagger and arrogance that royals often display often without material, as is in this case.

Sahib is earning his butter courtesy some petty crimes and the money he gets from his father’s mistress who has inherited all the royal property. His wife, the so-called Biwi, is a sex-starved, psychologically ill woman who befriends unknown men quite seamlessly. The main plot is that from the movie that inspired the modern version of Guru Dutt-directed classic Sahib Biwi Aur Ghulam. SAG (Sahib Bibi Aur Gangster) is a cool rip-off that entertains today’s generation and also plays with an underexplored genre of royalty (my last favourite was Eklavya). Moving forward with the plot, Sahib recruits a con driver in Babloo who develops a steamy affair with Biwi. As the story moves further, and for a change it is a well-paced film, Sahib sorts out his political mess with the help of Babloo and a loyal assistant. Babloo also helps Sahib kill his main rival, hence developing a bond with Sahib. On the other hand, he does an Omkara-kind of act by getting Sahib against his mistress and eventually getting her killed.

The story ends with an envious Babloo taking a shot at Sahib, and Biwi shooting at Babloo. The paralysed Sahib ends up as Biwi’s card to stand in elections. Overall, Sahib Biwi Aur Gangster is a good pastime that entertains and puzzles. With a slightly better plot, directorial value and editing, it could have been a modern cult hit. Also, Randeep Hooda is a huge letdown. He looks out of sorts and barely convincing. Mahi Gill fails to exude the charm and pathos of Meena Kumari of original. Music is at best average.

For those who are DT Cinemas loyals, beware of their cafe’s coke. It tastes like sugarless soda. Such a spoiler!

Very Very English

Posted on September 30th, 2011 by Harsh

The reason I was looking forward to Johnny English Reborn was that I had thoroughly enjoyed Johnny English when it was released some 5 years back. For the uninitiated, Johnny English, played by the inimitable Rowan Atkinson (popularly known as Mr Bean), is a spoof/parody of James Bond, the suave MI7 agent. Johnny English Reborn does not match the earlier version but is a laugh riot in parts. The movie begins funny and ends funny and in between has its funny moments though some are bit stretched, like the helicopter and Hong Kong chase gangster chase. The storyline is pretty much predictable but then that’s never the motivation with such films.

The film begins in the hills of Tibet where Johnny English, after a fiasco in his last operation in Mozambique, is in a monastery for five years, learning some unimaginable arts like dragging a rock with his penis and easily taking blows on his groin. He is summoned by the MI7 when the intelligence learns that the Chinese Premiere is under threat when he’d be meeting the British Prime Minister. The comedy of errors begins right there. For those who have followed Rowan for ages will get to see his famous facial expressions and antics. One of the most laughable scenes is when he is having a discussion with the British PM and the intelligence team, and his chair elevates and descends to the level of the table. As usual, Mr English’s expressions complement well.

The leading lady Rosamund Pike is quite incidentally played by bond girl in real James Bond movie, Die Another Day. The stunner plays the role of a psychoanalyst and love interest of Johnny English though she barely has 20 minutes of screen presence. Rest of the cast does its job where the major attention of the audience is certainly on Mr Atkinson.

Johnny English will in parts remind you of James Bond Movies and Where Eagles Dare especially in the end where English chases the antagonist on a moving trolley in the Alps. The directorial value could have been better and the some scenes more succinct. The movie lacks novelty but will still make you laugh.

Capturing Alexander!

Posted on September 26th, 2011 by Harsh

Oliver Stone is one Hollywood director who I would dare put on the same pedestal as Spielberg or Scorsese. His work is immensely researched, painstakingly directed and absolutely mesmerizing. Platoon, Born on the Fourth of July and Wall Street are films that are engraved in the eternity. What inspired me to watch Alexander, quite honestly, was the VCD that I bought for Rs 69 recently. More than that, it was Oliver Stone himself that made me raise my eyebrows.

Let me put this first: Alexander is a film that can only interest history buffs. It’s not made in a way that it would appeal to the general masses. The 2004 epic which depicts the life of Alexander the Great, from his childhood to death, is narrated by Ptolemy (played by ever supreme Anthony Hopkins). The film takes you right to the childhood, where Alexander is being raised by his snake-charming mother Olympias (very impressive Angelina Jolie) and has a difficult relationship with his one-eyed father Philip II (Van Kilmer, really?). Alexander’s greatness is established right from the beginning when he intellectually debates with his famed tutor Aristotle, when he tames a horse, who is afraid of his own shadow, to the delight of his father, when he dreams of conquering the great Persian empire. As he grows to be 20, his father is assassinated (probably by his strong-willed mother so that Alexander can be crowned the new king).

On becoming the king, Alexander (now an able solider and ambitious young man) immediately launches his campaign to conquer the known world. He begins the crusade with a strong army of 50,000 soldiers and brave generals. He outwits and outplays the Persian army and establishes the capital at Babylon where he also marries a tribal girl, though the film in parts also hints at his homosexuality. Perhaps it has to do with the relationship between Achilles and Patrokulas, especially because Alexander is heavily influenced by the former (reminded me of Troy and Brad Pitt). After conquering the Persian empire, Alexander launches his most ambitious mission of conquering the Indian empire. He reaches India after crossing the 800-km long Hindu Kush (now in Af-Pak) amidst chilling cold and mutiny in his army.

Alexander launches a merciless battle in India against king Porus and is heavily wounded. After winning the northern empire, he wants to move ahead crossing the Ganges to conquer the region of Bengal. However, his army is disintegrated by now, Alexander has survived two attempts to poison him, and killed one of his loyal generals in a drunken brawl. Compelled, tired, wounded and ill, Alexander takes a route back to Babylon where he dreams of capturing Arabia and uniting Asia and Europe. It is here that his close friend and partner dies, and Alexander breathes his last. It is still debated how Alexander died. Many books claim that he died due to illness such as typhoid, malaria, etc or could have been potentially poisoned. I think he might just have had a heart attack after years of stress, ill-health and alcohol consumption. 

Alexander the film is a brave attempt by Oliver Stone. Epics, unfortunately, have not done well in Hollywood, since the days of Lawrence of Arabia. The performances are excellent, sets are magnificently done, and the story is fascinating. Why Alexander failed at Box Office was perhaps that has more of facts than masala. Nonetheless, it is a memorable one-time watch. 

Crazy Stupid Love: Living up to the title, not genre!

Posted on September 19th, 2011 by Harsh

Crazy Stupid Love is like that ODI where the first set of 15 overs are entertaining and the last ten are slam bang. It’s the in-between where the customary singles ate taken that the game gets predictable and boring. CSL is a film that promises much to begin with, with impressive plot build-up, rib-tickling dialogues and performing star cast. Carl is 44, with a dream job and a loving family. One day, his wife, Emily, asks for a divorce and the poor guy agrees without giving any argument. Emily, his wife (eternally supreme Julianne Moore) is having an affair with an accountant in office.

The real story begins when Carl meets the Casanova punk Jacob while ruing over his fate in a bar. Upon his recommendation, he changes his avatar to fashion cloth-wearing, pickup line-expert like confident middle-aged man who goes on a women-sleeping spree (he accidentally sleeps with his son’s teacher). That’s a way to get his women back and he eventually does in the end. In between all that, Jacob falls in love with Carl’s daughter and Carl’s son falls for the babysitter at home who has a sexual crush on Carl. The whole mash up does create a confusion and leads to a good old Romcom.

The problem with the film is the treatment. The two directors of the film previously made Jim Carrey-starrer I Love Philip Morris which was a hugely despicable. In parts where they drift from plot building towards movement of the plots, the film becomes a parody of cult hits American Beauty and my favorite Fight Club. There are ill-treated romantic scenes that fail to make you feel. Tear-jerking does not happen when it’s supposed to be. It tries to become a film where you laugh and a tear drops off your eyes, but that does not happen. You are at best grinning. For me, Crazy Stupid Love started well and ended satisfactorily. The script writer somewhere lost the steam in between, trying to perhaps make another cult hit like American Beauty. All in all, it’s a one-time watch with impressive performances.

Love Actually: Actually Love

Posted on September 11th, 2011 by Harsh

I stumbled upon Love Actually VCD last week and bought it at a mouth-watering price of Rs. 69 (I bought 5 others too). I had heard of Love Actually earlier, but I have never been a fan of Rom-Coms so never had the motivation to watch it. However, Love Actually is not a typical Jack Nicholson kind of Rom-com. It is a bit different as it delves into various kinds of love – between husband and wife, father and son, prime minister and his housemaid (with no inspiration from Clinton-Lewinsky incident), boss and secretary, colleagues, brother and sister, woman and his man’ best friend, etc. The film starts with a touching voice over from the ever good-looking Hugh Grant who talks about various forms of love and how it touches him to see people meeting with warmth at Heathrow Airport.

Love Actually has quite a few stories, ten of them if I am not wrong. They are not exactly interwoven, but people do come to the common point (Heathrow) at the end. One of the most brilliant aspects of Love Actually is excellent performance by each actor. We have the recently Academy Award winning Colin Firth as a writer who gives a tear-jerking performance. Then there’s the affable Hugh Grant as Prime Minister who is attracted to a chubby staff member, and takes no guard when verbally attacking his powerful American counterpart (played by an unassuming Billy Bob Thorton). My favourite however is Bull Nighy, an ageing yet witty pop star who redoes the old number “Love is all around” replacing the word “love” with “Christmas.” He is absolutely funny, full-of-life and adds the much needed humor in between some high emotion. Laura Linney (Mystic River, Man of the Year) plays a charming, sensible worker who is in love with a colleague for over two years, but when things do come true, she goes to provide comfort to her mentally sick brother. Good performance, by her!

Liam Neeson is wasted in a role that was made for someone like Robin Williams. Keira Knightly hardly has any screen presence and timing. Emma Thompson does well in a crucial role of Prime Minister’s sister, a dutiful mother, and a tolerant wife. The best part of the film is the way climax is done. In a clichéd sense, it makes you laugh while you realize you also have a tear in your eye.  Rowan Atkinson (our favourite Mr Bean) is superb in his small role as an obsessed gift wrapper.

For all reasons that you should watch the film, watch it to witness love in many forms and sizes and countries. I liked the way it started and ended, and everything in between was entertaining. And then it quite formidably reasserts the fact that love is indeed all around and within us.

My All-Time Scorsese’s Favorite

Posted on August 28th, 2011 by Harsh

A few days ago I was busy brainstorming on a creative for a film company. I was supposed to think of a script that highlighted the work and talent of Martin Scorsese. Since I have been a big Scorsese fan for ages, I thought why not written down a piece that lists my favourite Scorsese’s work.

So, here are a few with a bit of synopsis

#1 – The Departed – While some may list Taxi Driver or Raging Bull as their favourites, my favourite is the multi-starrer that gave Martin Scorsese his first Academy Award after being nominated twice and losing to first time directors (He lost to Robert Redford for Ordinary People in 1981 and to Kevin Costner for Dances with Wolves in 1990). An English adaptation of a Hong Kong film Infernal Affairs, The Departed focuses on a complex plot where a cop is induced in underworld and an underworld man is plotted as a cop to exchange vital information. With a stellar cast in Leonardo DiCaprio, Jack Nicholson and a brilliant Matt Damon, The Departed was a real feather in Scorsese’s crown. With a brilliant screenplay and unpredictable twists, The Departed is a collector’s item.

 

#2 – Goodfellas – Again, I am going for the less favourable one. “Do you think I am funny?” “What do you mean I am funny?” These immortal quotes from temperamental character Joe Pesci still resonate in film lover’s mind. Goodfellas, a film adaptation of the book Wiseguy is a criminal masterpiece. The film starred Scorsese’s friend Robert De Niro, Ray Liotta and inimitable Joe Pesci. Centred on the wildly-ambitious character of Ray Liotta, Goodfellas looks into the dirty world of nurturing criminals and the lure of money and power that finally leads to their downfall. Widely regarded as one of the greatest crime films, Goodfellas circles the rise and fall of criminals in the 1970s. You’ll love it for more than one reason.

# 3 – Gangs of New YorkDaniel Day-Lewis. Period. Watch it for the greatest actor of this generation. It’s a pity Daniel Day-Lewis won all major awards (including BAFTA and Golden Globe) for his portrayal of a native American butcher but Academy which was presented to Brody for The Pianist. But nothing can be taken away from the genius Scorsese. The film illuminates with brilliant sets that portray the Unites States of late 1800s and the poignancy of Leonardo DeCaprio, the orphan of Irish immigrant who is slaughtered by the Butcher. The film was shot in a studio in Italy and was far ahead of its times. I personally love the soundtrack “Hands that Built America” by U2.

# 4 – Raging Bull – Raging Bull gave Robert De Niro his only Academy Award and how thoroughly he deserved it. Depicting the successful and troubled life of middle weight champion Jake LaMotta, it was Robert De Niro’s finest performance after Godfather II. The film was shot in black and white to lend it an authentic feel and touch. De Niro gained and lost 30 kgs (reminding me of Christian Bale in The Machinist) to portray the insane character of a temperamental boxer. A true classic!

# 5 – Shutter Island – This was a real surprise for me. It was shunned by critics before I watched it at home, so I did not have any expectations. However, Shutter Island (another book adaptation) is a movie that grows on you as it progresses. A psychological thriller filmed inside an imaginary island prison brings out the state of a prisoner. Ok, I have given away the suspense here! Watch DeCaprio do well when handled by his master, and Ben Kingsley reminds us why he once won as Oscar. An unusually different film by Scorsese, but one of the best that I have seen in the past two years.

# 6 – The Aviator – No other Scorsese fan is going to rate The Aviator so low. The Aviator is a complete package, story of a nutcase Howard Hughes who was a compulsive businessman. A film maker and a flying enthusiast, he made and broke his empire, displaying the American capitalism of the 40s. Scorsese handled the film with great finesse. It’s good that no other director attempted to bring Hughes on screen because no body could have done such as great job. Di Caprio fit the role like fish to water. Cate Blanchett was particularly impressive as Audrey Hepburn. A psychological drama that puts across the life of an idiosyncratic entrepreneur, The Aviator is truly a collector’s item.

#7 – Casino – Oh! What a film! Casino is the most underrated work of Scorsese. A suave Robert De Niro, a notorious Joe Pesci and a sensuous Sharon Stone bed on a story plot that once again narrates the mastery of Scorsese on criminal films. Casino showcases the working of a casino, money laundering and the conflicts of Robert De Niro who runs a casino. It also has one of my all-time favourite Robert De Niro dialogues where he threatens his wife’s ex-lover: “Next time, carry a gun. You’ll have a chance!” in a typical Robert De Niro fashion. Go for Casino. It’s a typical pot-boiler.

# 8 – Taxi Driver – One of Scrosese’s earliest films, Taxi Driver is a classic now with the famous scene where De Niro looks back and says “Are you talking to me?” repeatedly. The weird character of Robert De Niro is the highlight. He is an insomniac who drives taxi at night and is fascinated by a hooker. He has his views on politics. Watch it for Robert De Niro and how intelligently Scorsese handles character development.


 
These are my top 8 but there are a few more like The Last Temptation of Christ and Kundan that I haven’t watched yet. The Age of Innocence is another film that I watched some time back but there’s nothing home to write about it apart from the fact that it had the best stars of that time in Daniel-Day Lewis and Michelle Pfifer.  Another film could be Robert De Niro starrer The King of Comedy which is a black comedy, but qualifies to be once-in-a-while kind of film.

Don’t make this, Dobara!

Posted on July 26th, 2011 by Harsh

Even after trying hard, it is difficult to gather what’s so funny about Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara. Zoya Akhtar, in a quest to rake in some quick money, has got together a handful of bankable actors, made them shed their acting skills and acquire mediocrity, put in a trip to Spain, and made hash of a script that could have been used to make an average film. ZNDB is worse than slapstick humor, because it’s humor that will hardly induce laughter. The seriousness of message that comes out in form of Farhan Akhtar’s poetry, can hardly be related to; in fact, you question the existence of it. In the end, the film is nothing but a mash-up of various emotions. Emotions is not the right word; I’d say behaviour.

The film lacks some very fundamentals that go into film-making. First of all, there is no development of characters. Arjun (Hrithik Roshan), a London-based broker, is supposed to be money-obsessed who lacks the zeal for life. His catharsis happens to soon without taking him to the pinnacle and without striking the chords of the audience. Kabir (Abhay Deol) is seemingly happy with his engagement, and with a couple of everyday arguments, wants to abandon his girlfriend, inspired by his friends and a bull race incident??? Imran (Farhan Akhtar) in search of his father, meets him in Spain, and what is supposed to be a emotional talk between father and son, ends up as an ordeal for the audience. I seriously want to know if that scene touched any one.

The three friends, like you see in Dil Chahta Hai and Rock On, never seem close enough. The poor direction further makes them look like three men from three different planets. For once, I find Abhay Deol absolutely uncharismatic. Hrithik was never meant for that kind of role. He is such a director’s actor as we saw in Guzaarish. Farhan looked out of sorts with a grungy hairstyle and a weird dressing sense. The women hardly had any role but Kalki did a decent job.

So, what is Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara? A bit of poor version of Before Sunrise when Hrithik takes an eye-opening walk with Katrina Kaif and finds himself at the harsh end of the world. Zoya tries hard to make it Dil Chahta Hai kind of humor, but then the line between subtlety and stupidity is so thin. ZNDB is no hangover; at best a parody of the great film. It tries to do a bit of 3 Idiots, but lacks in the quality of humor, development of characters, and compelling cinema that made 3 Idiots a classic. Years from now, Zoya Akhtar would look at ZNDB and say we made millions, and audience like us will pity the state of Indian cinema.

My plea to Zoya Akhtar – Don’t make a film dobara! Let your brother do what he does best.

Can’t really belly this!

Posted on July 9th, 2011 by Harsh

Okay, I went to watch Delhi Belly for the sole reason that my friends praised it on Facebook. It was like it became the wall post of every user profile I stumbled upon on social media. Also, offline there was enough praise for the film that I was almost became restless until I watch the film.

I’ll begin rude. Delhi Belly is a desi version of Guy Ritchie films not gone exactly like it is supposed to be. I don’t know what this genre is called, so I call it Guy Ritchie genre. Those who have watched Snatch, Rock n Rolla, and Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels know what I mean. Those are the kinds of films that thrive on miscommunication or what we tend to call goof-ups, leading to a chain of comic situations. Whilst Guy Ritchie has hardly ever shot a bad scene, Delhi Belly seemed to be forced comedies in parts. If you talk about funny story of three friends, Dil Chahta Hai still remains my original best!

So, why there are more wrongs than rights for Delhi Belly? Before I say that I should clarify that I liked Delhi Belly but it was not really worth it’s overhype, like we have found an alien on Earth. It was as regular a film as there have been; it just banked on some sexual comedy that wasn’t the best executed as well. For me, Delhi Belly really never took off practically. I know films are not supposed to, but you cannot help wondering throughout that why three people with reasonably respected jobs can’t afford better accommodation and vehicles. Secondly, the humor at times was least comical such as Vir Das’ dance at his ex-girlfriend’s imaginary wedding. Only the last 30 minutes hooked me, which was otherwise a gaffe that seemed more manufactured than natural. I don’t mind a bollywood movie in English but it was easy to see that Imran Khan is not naturally an English language speaker in his real life, and lacked the fluency. I think Vijay Raaz, again outstanding, was the only one who carried the language with utmost ease and without any pressure of sounding ‘English’.

The good part about Delhi Belly is the script (I hope that it’s not lifted or ‘inspired’ from some film that was produced in 1950s in the remotest corner of Latin America; our producers have the talent of script hunting). It’s a wonderfully-weaved script which at times is let down by the director in its execution. The casting is perfect; apart from Imran, most actors are relatively unknown and they deliver fabulously. The comic timing is amazing in parts, and the films rounds off very well. I am not too sure if we needed an Aamir Khan item number in the end.

Delhi Belly, as we say, is a good one-time watch, but lacks the ingredients to turn into a Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron like classic.

Can’t Die without you!

Posted on June 23rd, 2011 by Harsh

Writing movie reviews (If I dare call myself a critic) sometimes becomes a process where you absorb emotions and the review in itself becomes an outlet. When I say ‘sometimes’, I mean for some kind of movies that are heavy on emotions, which could be of a wide variety. Finding Neverland is a movie that epitomizes love for all in various forms. It celebrates the love for a woman, a man, children, profession, life, people, nature. Just when you think you have answers to most questions in the film, the little boy Peter asks his affable uncle James “Why did my mother have to die?” to which Uncle replies quiet candidly: “I don’t know”. It may be the simplest of the answers to the most complex questions, but it portrays the same state of mind of two people who are about 30 years apart. That we are not permanent here is the harshest of truths that we ever like to face.

I have never liked Johnny Depp so much as I was bowled over by his charm in Finding Neverland. For me it was finding Depp. It’s a pity that he has wasted his talent as Jack Sparrow! Moving to Finding Neverland, it’s a poignant story that begins with dismay of a playwright and perhaps ends with it; it begins with his want for theatrical success and ends with the want of a woman he seemed to love for the better part of the film. The subject of love Sylvia Davies, played by the in-form Kate Winslet, is a widow with 4 boys. Apparently, Sylvia still lives with the grief of her dead husband, and is occupied with the parenting of her 4 sons. Playwright James is the only friend the family seems to have, especially because he is great friends with the boys and enacts plays with them. Having developed great acquaintance with the family and platonic love for Sylvia, James’ own personal life suffers as his wife becomes involved another man. His social life suffers because people doubt his relationship with Sylvia and the boys.

Unflustered, James finds inspiration for his next play from the Davies’ family and starts scripting a play for the coming season. The play producer, played by impressive Dustin Hoffman, initially dislikes the idea of the play, but gives James a go-ahead on his past reputation. James continues to pen his play centred on the concept of Neverland, a place that he had imagined as a child. Sounding more like a piece of fiction and a far cry from conventional plays, the play turns out to be a major success in the early 20th century London.

As James spends more time with the Davies family, Sylvia’s health deteriorates. Eventually she crumbles to her illness, leaving the 4 boys orphaned. James and the boys’ grandmother take the co-parenting of the 4 boys upon Sylvia’s request in the will.
What stands out in the film is Depp’s subtle performance, his meditative addiction to plays, his pure and clean heart. Finding Neverland is a quiet film that may move you, but does turn into a tearjerker, thankfully! It gives an insight into the life of a playwright – his dilemmas, his state of mind, his obsessions, and his calmness amidst surrounding hustle and bustle.

Finding Neverland is good old cinema that can be a good break from wham-bam cinema that overrules us today!

The Charm of Hangover

Posted on May 30th, 2011 by Harsh

There’s a thing with sequels. How do you evaluate their worthiness? Do you treat them as standalone movies or compare them curiously with their prequels? My guess is that we end up doing the latter; Some movies in the past such as Godfather II and Bourne Franchisee have lived up their highly successful prequels. Last week, Pirates of the Caribbean sequel disappointed a lot of franchisee fans and non-followers such as me.

Hangover II is a ‘good’ film without the huge pressure of its prequel; as a sequel it doesn’t really tickle enough. If Hangover was novel and i-threw-my-popcorn-out-while-laughing film, Hangover II duplicates the storyline (with a different plot) and lets you digest your food for the better part. Okay, it’s a funny film that catches some action as it ages, but starts quite disdainfully and the audience laughs primarily because they still reel under the hangover of the actors’ comic aura. Alan is funny as ever and delivers quite stupendously. Stu, the cute dentist from the first film, who married a whore in Las Vegas, is getting married to his Thai girlfriend in Thailand and of course his friends in Alan, Doug and Phil are there. To add to the chaos, even Chow appears surprisingly.

The storyline pretty much remains the same. On the wedding eve, friends get drunk with the bride’s younger brother and Stanford prodigy Teddy. Unsurprisingly, they get up next morning to find themselves in a shady Bangkok hotel with Teddy missing, and his finger being licked by a monkey. What unfolds from there is a trail of discoveries into what happened the night before. One clue leads to another; and one dilemma leads to another. Stu discovers he had sex with a ‘ladyboy’; all three of them kidnapped a monk; they threw bottles at police, etc.

There’s nothing much to the script really, as most comedies thrive on situations and actors’ comic timing. Hangover II suffers from lack of strong situations, unlike the first one that surprised with the introduction of Mike Tyson. Hangover II also has Tyson but in the end in a sublime role which looks more forced than natural. I’d conclude it as a film that would make you laugh but not enough. It’s like a laughter therapy session where you laugh because you came there with a mindset to laugh your lungs out but ended up coughing out a laugh because that’s what you paid for.

Just a word of caution for those who are DT Cinema regulars in DLF Promenade, please avoid the theatre on Sundays; it’s chaotic, the service sucks (which is not much deviation from the usual), management is lazy and you would wait for hours for food (they kill it) and tickets. DT is a safer bet on weekdays.